Optic pathway glioma (OPG) can result in visual deterioration. Symptomatic patients often report deficits in visual acuity (VA), visual field, visual-evoked potentials (VEPs), strabismus, proptosis, disc swelling, and other visual/neurological problems. VA itself remains one of the most important outcome measures for OPG patients, with various studies showing strong ties of VA level to overall quality of life and well-being . Maintenance of favorable VA and vision outcomes is of paramount importance in the management of OPG.
In terms of management of OPG, surgery and radiotherapy are used on a more limited basis because of location of the tumors and risk of secondary tumors, respectively. Tumor stabilization often prioritized, and chemotherapy is considered ideal for tumor stabilization in OPG, but vision is not always retained and may worsen in some cases, partially due to low radiographic efficacy and long time interval to response of the current chemotherapy regimen.
In the prior study, the investigators modified the traditional carboplatin combined with vincristine regimen by increasing the dose of carboplatin and combining with an anti-angiogenic drug. Of the 15 OPG patients, objective response rate was 80% and the time to response was only 3.3 months. 8 (53%) patients experienced an improvement in visual acuity during therapy and 6 (40%) were stable, which was higher than the historical studies.
This study was launched to further verify the clinical efficacy of the modified regimen and its effect on visual acuity improvement.
Who can participate
Age range
3 Months – 21 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 3months and ≤21years;
* Patients with optic pathway gliomas diagnosed by histopathology or characteristic brain MRI and clinical features;
* Measurable lesions, surgical resection degree \< 95% or postoperative residual tumor ≥1.5cm\^2;
* KPS score ≥50 (age \>12 years) or Lansky score ≥50 (age ≤12 years);
* Clinical symptoms such as decreased visual acuity, visual field defect, optic disc edema, exophthalmia, increased intracranial pressure, diencephalic syndrome, etc;
* No dysfunction of major organs.
Exclusion Criteria:
* MRI examination is not available.
* Failing to comply with the visual examination.
* H3K27 mutations, even histopathological grade 1/2.
* Receiving any other investigational agent.
* History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to the drugs used in this study.
* Patients who have received organ transplants.
* Patients infected with HIV or treponema pallidum.
* Suffering from serious cardiovascular disease;T wave inversion or elevation or ST segment changes.
* Patients who had coagulation disorder and were being treated with thrombolytic or anticoagulant drugs. Patients with significant clinical bleeding symptoms or clear bleeding tendency occurred within 3 months before enrollment, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhagic gastric ulcer, gastrointestinal perforation, baseline fecal occult blood ++ or above, intratumoral or intracranial bleeding, or vasculitis, etc. Art…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.