Dexmedetomidine in the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Dementia (TRANQUILITY II) (NCT05271552) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Dexmedetomidine in the Treatment of Agitation Associated With Dementia (TRANQUILITY II)
United States151 participantsStarted 2022-04-27
Plain-language summary
A study to determine the safety and efficacy of BXCL501 dosing for episodes of agitation associated with dementia when they occur (given as needed \[PRN\]), for a maximum of 28 doses within a 12-week treatment period.
Who can participate
Age range
65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. All subjects must have a diagnosis of probable AD based on NIA-AA criteria (2018)
. Episodes of psychomotor agitation (e.g., kick, bite, flailing)
. Subjects exhibit behaviors that are congruent with the International Psychogeriatric Association criterion for agitation representing a change from the subject's usual behavior
. A score of 15 to 23 on the Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE)
. Subjects who read, understand, and provide written informed consent, or who have a LAR to provide consent on their behalf
. Subjects who are deemed to be medically appropriate for study participation by the principal investigator
. Participants who agree to use a medically acceptable and effective birth control method
Exclusion criteria
. Subjects with dementia or other memory impairment not due to probable AD.
. Clinical diagnosis of probable AD should not be applied when there is evidence of a cerebrovascular incident temporally related to the worsening of cognitive function.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Absolute Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale- Excited Component (PEC) Total Score for the First Episode of Agitation
. Subjects with agitation caused by acute intoxication.
. Subjects with significant risk of suicide or homicide per the investigator's assessment.
. Subjects who are medically unstable or in recovery. Note: Subjects with a remote (\>5 years) history of stroke may be included, regardless of size/location.
. History of clinically significant syncope or syncopal attacks, orthostatic hypotension within the past 2 years, current evidence of hypovolemia, orthostatic hypotension, bradycardia.
. Subjects who had a total score of \>13 (ie, high fall risk) on the John Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool.