Midodrine Versus Albumin for Prevention of Paracentesis Induced Circulatory Disturbance (NCT05240391) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 3
Midodrine Versus Albumin for Prevention of Paracentesis Induced Circulatory Disturbance
India50 participantsStarted 2021-02-20
Plain-language summary
Paracentesis-induced circulatory disturbance (PICD) is a very common cause of mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing large-volume paracentesis. Albumin is commonly used in decompensated cirrhosis during large-volume paracentesis. However, it may not be cost-effective and has side effects like volume overload and transfusion reactions.
Therefore the investigator proposed to use midodrine which is a drug that increases the mean arterial pressure. The investigators hypothesized that midodrine may be effective in preventing PICD in acute on chronic liver failure patients requiring modest paracentesis. This has already been found to be effective in initial studies in decompensated cirrhosis
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Consecutive patients above 18 years of age who fulfilled Asia Pacific Association of study of liver disease (APASL) criteria for ACLF and required paracentesis for moderate to tense ascites were included in the study.
. Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF) was defined as an acute hepatic insult manifesting as jaundice (Serum bilirubin ≥ 5 mg/dL (85 micromole/L) and coagulopathy (INR ≥ 1.5 or prothrombin activity \< 40%) complicated within 4 weeks by clinical ascites and/or encephalopathy in a patient with previously diagnosed or undiagnosed chronic liver disease/cirrhosis and is associated with a high 28-day mortality -
Exclusion criteria
. Patients with acute kidney injury defined as serum creatine of \> 0.3 mg/dl above the baseline
. Severe cardiopulmonary disease
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Prevention of Paracentesis induced circulatory disturbance