Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
Egypt28 participantsStarted 2022-04-01
Plain-language summary
The aim of this study will be to evaluate the clinical performance of polyethylene fiber reinforced resin composite restorations versus bulk fill resin composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 55 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Patients ages 18 to 55 years.
✓. Patients with endodontically treated teeth.
✓. Patients with good general health.
✓. Patients with good recall availability.
✓. Successfully endotreated molar teeth.
✓. Endodontically treated teeth (ETT) with at least two remaining walls.
✓. ETT without apical or periapical pathosis.
✓. ETT with healthy peridontium.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Patients who are allergic to product ingredient.
✕. Patients who need indirect restorations.
✕. Patients with poor oral hygiene.
✕. Patients with history of bruxism and parafunctional habits.
✕. Teeth with noncarious cervical lesions.
✕. ETT with more than two remaining walls.
✕. Presence of apical or periapical pathosis.
✕
What they're measuring
1
Change in the clinical performance
Timeframe: Change from the baseline at six months.