The purpose of the study is to compare pain, complications, and quality of life after gastrostomy tube is placed by either percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) or radiologically-inserted gastrostomy (RIG) method.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Change in pain with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: Before the procedure, within 24 hours after procedure, at 48-96 hours after procedure, and at 6 weeks after procedure
Major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: Within 24 hours after procedure
Major and minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: At 6 weeks after procedure
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: At 3 months, if tube still in place
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: At 6 months, if tube still in place
Minor complications with gastrostomy-tube placement, comparing RIG with PEG
Timeframe: At 9 months, if tube still in place