The objective of this research is to compare the new ankle foot orthosis (AFO) with prior support developed by Turbomed, with the AFO with posterior support from Turbomed as well as two competing AFOs currently on the market. With this research, we seek to answer the following questions: * Is the new AFO as biomechanically efficient as the AFOs currently on the market? * Is the new AFO more comfortable than the AFO currently on the market? * Is the new AFO easier to put on and attach than the AFOs currently on the market?
Age range
18 Years – 65 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Knee flexion angle during gait
Timeframe: At delivery
Hip flexion angle during gait
Timeframe: At delivery
Minimum foot clearance
Timeframe: At delivery
Comfort of participants with orthosis
Timeframe: At delivery
Easy to put on orthosis
Timeframe: At delivery