Rehabilitation Assessment and Progress Tracking System Based on Video Images for Dysphagic Patients (NCT05141539) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Rehabilitation Assessment and Progress Tracking System Based on Video Images for Dysphagic Patients
Thailand30 participantsStarted 2021-02-01
Plain-language summary
The current cervical range of motion (CROM) and tongue movement measurement methods are not reliable between observers, which is not practical in real-world usage. This research is to develop the cervical range of motion measurement, and tongue movement estimation software, to compare between the developed software and the current measurement techniques, and to test in clinical aspects for reliability and validity assessment. The investigators investigate the developed software in healthy people in phase 1. In phases 2 and 3, the investigators compare the software to the standard measurement methods in dysphagic patients who have head and neck cancer for reliability and validity.
Who can participate
Age range18 Years – 80 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. This study requires the subject to be between 18 and 80 years old.
✓. The subject needs to be Thai.
✓. The subject can communicate in the Thai language.
✓. Working as an occupational therapist in Ramathibodhi hospital.
✓. The subject is consent.
✓. This study requires the subject to be between 18 and 80 years old.
✓. The subject needs to have stable vital signs.
✓. The subject can make the body steady sit on the chair longer than 30 minutes.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Cannot participate in the experiment.
✕. The therapist denied or withdrew.
✕. Have pain around the examination area such as oral mucosa, tongue, and neck.
What they're measuring
1
Intra-rater reliability between the developed rehabilitation assessment software and the standard CROM measurement method.
Timeframe: One hour
2
Inter-rater reliability between the developed rehabilitation assessment software and the standard CROM measurement method.
Timeframe: One hour
3
Concurrent measurement validity between the developed rehabilitation assessment software and the standard CROM measurement method.
Timeframe: One hour
4
Criterion-related validity between the developed rehabilitation assessment software, and VFSS and FOIS.