The objectives of this study contains 3 parts: (1) a comparison of 1-step parenteral artesunate (AS) versus conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate in patients with severe malaria to assess the feasibility of administration, parasite and fever clearance times in two countries, (2) a quantification of convenience and costs of the new 1-step artesunate parenteral formulation versus the conventional formulation in a randomised study, (3) A cost analysis of 1-step parenteral artesunate using data from Part 1 \& Part 2. This will assess health facility-level costs, and also health system costs to encompass all costs of a potential change from conventional to 1-step artesunate, including re-training, materials, and drug replacement. The conventional formulation of injectable artesunate requires a 2-step reconstitution and dilution of the artesunate hemisuccinate powder. A new formulation of injectable artesunate has been developed by Fosun Pharma requiring a simpler 1-step reconstitution. Bioequivalence of the new formulation to the conventional formulation. For part 1, a total number of participants of this study would be 200 participants, estimated 100 per site will be recruited. For part 2, a total number of 40 semi-structured interviews with study staff, health staff, policy makers, and stake holders; and survey/questionnaires with 150 health staff.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Time to administration of treatment comparing 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations
Timeframe: 3 days
Costs of administration of 1-step vs. conventional 2-step parenteral artesunate formulations
Timeframe: 3 days