CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Outcomes Between TransPRK and Off-flap Epi-LASIK

38 participantsStarted 2016-03-01

Plain-language summary

To compare the quantitative and qualitative optical outcomes between single-step transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy (TransPRK) and off-flap epipolis laser in situ keratomileusis (Epi-LASIK) in moderate to high myopia.we included patients with moderate to high myopia who were randomized to have TransPRK in one eye and Epi-LASIK in the other eye. All patients underwent comprehensive ophthalmological examinations, including uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuities (CDVA), manifest refraction, intraocular pressure, anterior and posterior segment examination, corneal topography measured by Scheimpflug scanning-slit topographer (Pentacam, Oculus Optikgerate GmbH), contrast sensitivity (CS) under photopic and mesopic conditions (CSV-1000E, Vector Vision Inc., Greenville, OH, USA) with correction by spectacles, ocular wavefront aberrometry (OPD-Scan II, Nidek Co. Ltd). At each follow-up, CS and aberration measures were repeated 3 times and the average value was analyzed. Optical parameters were repeated 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS software (version 22.0, SPSS, Chicago, Inc.). Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to check the normal distribution of variables. Student t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test was used based on the normality of data. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Who can participate

Age range

19 Years – 38 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * age over 18 years * corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (LogMAR) of 0.10 or better * refractive error stabilized for at least 1 year * discontinued contact lens use for at least 2 weeks Exclusion Criteria: * presence of corneal scars * keratoconus * glaucoma * retinal diseases * a history of corneal or intraocular surgery

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

aberrations

Timeframe: 2016.03.01-2018.06.05

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05060094

SponsorWenzhou Medical University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2017-03-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Refractive Surgery trials