This is a pilot randomized study to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, safety, and effects of a novel tele-rehabilitation intervention for stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy. The specific aims and hypotheses are: Specific Aim 1: Conduct a pilot, phase IIb, parallel randomized (1:1) study to investigate the feasibility, acceptability, and safety of inspiratory muscle training and behavioral support to promote walking in tele-rehabilitation with stage I-IIIA lung cancer survivors following curative intent therapy (N=40). Hypothesis 1a: ≥ 20% eligible patients will enroll; ≥75% of participants will achieve ≥75% adherence to the tele-rehabilitation program. Hypothesis 1b: ≥75% of participants will perceive tele-rehabilitation as acceptable (Telemedicine Satisfaction and Usefulness Questionnaire ≥4). There will be 0 intervention adverse events. Specific Aim 2: Explore the effects of the tele-rehabilitation program (N=40). Hypothesis 2: At 12 weeks, participants in the tele-rehabilitation (experimental) arm, compared to education only (control) arm, will have a trend of greater improvements in outcomes, including: 1. accelerometry-measured physical activity (primary outcome); and 2. functional capacity, self-reported physical activity, control of dyspnea and anxiety symptoms, sleep quality, and quality of life (secondary outcomes).
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Difference in change in accelerometry-measured physical activity between baseline and week 12
Timeframe: Baseline, mid study (week 6), and end of study (week 12).