CompletedNot Applicable

Dural Puncture Epidural Technique Versus Conventional Epidural Techmique

Egypt50 participantsStarted 2021-08-18

Plain-language summary

This study will be conducted on 50 patients of ASA grade I and II aged from 25 to 55 years and presented for laparoscopic hysterectomy. Patients will be divided into two equal groups; group A control group for conventional epidural technique(n=25) and group B for 25G dural puncture epidural with 25G pencil point Whitacre spinal needle (n=25). Randomization will be done using computer generated number and concealed using sequentially numbered, sealed opaque envelope.

Who can participate

Age range25 Years – 55 Years

SexFEMALE

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * ASA I and II * Height(150-170 cm) Exclusion Criteria: * patient refusal * hypersensitivity to local anesthetic drugs * bleeding disorders and coagulopathy(platelets count less than 80000,INR less than 1.5 or therapeutic dose of anticoagulant).

What they're measuring

incidence of bilateral sacral blockade

Timeframe: Up to 30 minutes after local anesthetic injection

Trial details

NCT IDNCT05032677

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-11-02

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Gynecologic Disease Requiring Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Under Neuraxial Anesthesia trials