Observational Studies in Cancer Associated Thrombosis for Rivaroxaban - United States Cohort (NCT04979780) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
Observational Studies in Cancer Associated Thrombosis for Rivaroxaban - United States Cohort
United States3,708 participantsStarted 2021-07-20
Plain-language summary
Patients with active cancer are \~5-fold more likely to develop a venous thromboembolism (VTE) than those without. When VTE occurs, cancer patients carry an up to a 3-fold higher rate of thrombosis recurrence and \~twice the risk of bleeding during anticoagulation. Therefore, it is critical to utilize anticoagulants that optimize efficacy while minimizing bleeding risk when treating cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT).
Guidelines list direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) as an alternative to low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for treatment of CAT. The strength-of-recommendation for DOACs is based on data from multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing them to LMWHs to treat CAT, with results suggesting DOACs may reduce thrombosis risk but with potentially more frequent bleeding (particularly in those with certain gastrointestinal and genitourinary cancers).
Observational studies evaluating DOACs for CAT treatment have been published, but these studies have been either single-arm, evaluated cancer subtypes not recommended for DOAC treatment, were of limited sample size and/or employed heterogeneous definitions of active cancer. We seek to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus LMWH for CAT treatment in active cancer patients using a large de-identified electronic health record database.
Retrospective cohort analysis using US Optum® De-Identified EHR data. We will use Optum EHR (electronic health records) data from November January 1, 2012 through latest available data (currently September 2020).
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Be ≥18 years of age at the time of anticoagulation initiation.
* Have active cancer admitted to the hospital, emergency department or observation unit for acute DVT and/or PE.
* Treated with rivaroxaban (or any DOAC in secondary analysis) or LMWH as their first anticoagulant on day 7 post-acute CAT event diagnosis (index date) o increase the probability of accurately classifying patients' intended outpatient anticoagulant for CAT treatment and that patients are compared at the same point from diagnosis.
* Have been active in the data set for at least 12-months prior to the index event (based on the "First Month Active" field) and had at least one provider visit in the 12-months prior to the acute VTE event (baseline period).
Exclusion Criteria:
* Evidence of atrial fibrillation, recent hip/knee replacement (within 35 days of index VTE), ongoing VTE treatment, valvular heart disease defined as any rheumatic heart disease, mitral stenosis, or mitral valve repair/replacement.
* Pregnancy.
* Initiation of rivaroxaban at a dose other than 15 mg twice daily or non-therapeutic doses of other DOAC or LMWH (e.g., enoxaparin at a dose other than 1 mg/kg twice daily or 1.5 mg/kg once daily; dalteparin at a dose other than 200 IU/kg of total body weight)
* Evidence of use of anticoagulation use during the 12-months prior per written prescription or patient self-report
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Risk of recurrent VTE
Timeframe: at 3 month after treatment
2
Any clinically-relevant bleeding-related hospitalization