RecruitingPhase 4

Clinical and Radiographic Success of MTA vs Biodentine

United States646 participantsStarted 2021-11-12

Plain-language summary

The purpose of this prospective study is to compare the clinical and radiographic success of MTA and Biodentine as a medicament in vital pulp therapy in maxillary and mandibular primary molars in a pediatric population. There is limited research currently on Biodentine since it's a novel product. Biodentine is less expensive than MTA and does not cause discoloration like MTA. Biodentine may be an alternative medicament used for vital pulp therapy in primary molars.

Who can participate

Age range

2 Years – 12 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Male or female patients ages of 2 to ≤12 years. * Bilateral symptomatic or asymptomatic vital primary molars with caries approximating or into the pulp. * Patient who need a pulpotomy and/or indirect pulp cap treatments in two or more quadrants. * Parents of patients who can provide consent in English. * Patients who need treatment in an operating room setting at Geisinger. Exclusion Criteria: * Pre-operative radiographic or clinical symptoms associated with irreversible pulpitis or necrotic pulp. * Radiographs not displaying furcation region of the tooth. * Patients with cardiac conditions who need prophylaxis for infective Endocarditis. * Patients with any type of cancer in the past or present. * Non-restorable molars.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Rate of clinical success in pulpotomies and indirect pulp caps

Timeframe: 4 years

Rate of radiographic success in pulpotomies and indirect pulp caps

Timeframe: 4 years

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04863222

SponsorGeisinger Clinic

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2026-08-01

Contact for this trial

Gayatri Malik, DMD

570-271-6355 gmalik1@geisinger.edu

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Indirect Pulp Cap trials