Open-Label Prospective Study Comparing Long-Term Outcome With or Without HFNC in Patients With St… (NCT04840706) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedNot Applicable
Open-Label Prospective Study Comparing Long-Term Outcome With or Without HFNC in Patients With Stable Hypercapnic COPD
Stopped: It was not possible to achieve recruitment target
Finland3 participantsStarted 2022-04-21
Plain-language summary
The aims of the study are to compare long-term one-year outcome with or without AirvoTM in stabile hypercapnic COPD patients, who are non-compliant to NIV after an acute exacerbation of COPD.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:COPD patients 1) with at least two acute moderate or severe exacerbations during past 12 months, 2) who at the follow-up visit one month after an acute severe exacerbation of COPD are hypercapnic (capillary pCO2 \>6.5 kPa) and not willing to use NIV or have used it less than 4 h/d during the last month despite optimal settings prescribed by an experienced pulmonologist, or if a patient at the follow-up one month after a severe exacerbation is hypercapnic and is willing to try NIV (initiated at the follow-up visit, not at the ward), but then uses it less than 4h/d during the following month. Acute moderate (treated with short acting bronchodilators plus antibiotics and/or oral corticosteroids) and severe (patient requires hospitalization or visits the emergency room) exacerbations of COPD are defined according to the GINA Guidelines (GOLD 2019).
Exclusion Criteria: 1) OSA (diagnosed OSA or high suspicion OSA because of regular snoring, witnessed apneas and daytime sleepiness), 2) neuromuscular or chest wall disease, 3) BMI\>35 kg/m2 or 4) a patient is not able to give his/her informed consent for the study.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.