Stopped: Slow Patient Enrollment
Lacunar infarction is an ischemic stroke occurred by small perforating artery occlusion . Twenty percent of ischemic stroke is lacunar infarction. However, outcome of lacunar infarction is excellent, about 20-40% patients are suffered neurological worsening. Progressive lacunar infarction is associated poor functional outcome and neurological deficit. Currently, no treatment for progressive lacunar infarction is recommended on the guideline. Several small study reported that phenylephrine and magnesium may be helpful for progressive lacunar infarction. Carbogen is a mixture of 5% CO2 with 95% O2. Carbogen is safe and it is used for the treatment of sudden sensory neural hearing loss or ocular ischemia. CO2 dilate cerebral arteriole and concentration of CO2 is correlated with cerebral blood flow. Lacunar infarction is small and perfused with marginal flow by neighboring perforating arteriole. Increased cerebral blood flow following dilation of cerebral arteriole by CO2 might halt and revert progressive lacunar infarction. Induced hypertension is alternative treatment of progressive lacunar infarction. Increasing blood pressure also induce cerebral blood flow. Phenylephrine is an α1 agonist, phenylephrine act on peripheral artery and little effect on cerebral artery or heart. Several studies reported that the effectiveness of phenylephrine on progressing stroke. Therefore, this study will compare the effectiveness of carbogen versus phenylephrine in lacunar infarction patients who suffered neurological worsening.
Age range
20 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
percent improvement of NIHSS score in each group
Timeframe: 48 hours
difference of NIHSS score in each group
Timeframe: 48 hours
percent improvement of MRC score in each group
Timeframe: within 48 hours
difference of MRC score in each group
Timeframe: within 48 hours
Safety outcome: Side effect
Timeframe: within 7 days
Safety outcome: discontinuing patients
Timeframe: within 7 days