PAnitumumab REchallenge Followed by REgorafenib Versus the Reverse Sequence (NCT04787341) | Clinical Trial Compass
Active — Not RecruitingPhase 2
PAnitumumab REchallenge Followed by REgorafenib Versus the Reverse Sequence
Italy214 participantsStarted 2020-12-15
Plain-language summary
The association of doublet chemotherapy (FOLFOX and FOLFIRI) and anti-EGFR-moAbs (panitumumab or cetuximab) is a standard option for the first-line treatment of unresectable RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients, especially with left-sided primary tumour.
In RAS wt mCRC patients refractory to chemotherapy and anti-EGFR naive, the standard treatment sequence is an anti-EGFR-based therapy (panitumumab or cetuximab +/- irinotecan) followed by regorafenib.
In a phase II randomized Japanese study named REVERCE, a higher OS was reported in favour of an experimental strategy of regorafenib followed at progression by cetuximab +/- irinotecan compared with the reverse standard sequence in chemorefractory and anti-EGFR-naïve, RAS wt mCRC patients.
However, the limitations of the REVERCE study (phase II trial with a premature conclusion for poor accrual) do not allow us to draw definitive conclusions. In addition, nowadays, patients candidates to an anti-EGFR-based treatment, receive anti-EGFRMoAbs in earlier lines of therapy thus affecting the translation of these results in the current clinical practice.
Retrospective analyses and a phase II single-arm trial showed promising activity of anti-EGFR rechallenge in patients who previously achieved benefit from a first-line anti- EGFR-based treatment and not bearing RAS mutation on ct-DNA at the rechallenge baseline.
Based on these considerations, the Investigators designed the present phase II randomized study of panitumumab followed at progression by regorafenib versus the reverse sequence in RAS and BRAF wt mCRC patients with the following characteristics:
1. previous treatment with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and an anti-angiogenic agent (bevacizumab or aflibercept);
2. RECIST response or stable disease lasting at least 6 months to a previous first-line anti-EGFR-based treatment;
3. RAS and BRAF wt ct-DNA at the time of screening. The aim of this study is to compare the two sequences in a Caucasian population of patients candidates to anti-EGFR rechallenge.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Written informed consent to molecular analyses.
* Histologically proven diagnosis of CRC.
* At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST1.1
* ECOG PS ≤ 1.
* mCRC previously treated for metastatic disease with, or not considered candidates for, fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan and anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody (bevacizumab or aflibercept).
* RAS (codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117 and 146 of KRAS and NRAS genes) and BRAF (V600E mutation) wt status of primary CRC or related metastasis (local laboratory assessment).
* Previous first-line anti-EGFR-containing therapy producing at least a partial response or a stable disease ≥ 6 months.
* At least 4 months elapsed between the end of first-line anti-EGFR administration and screening.
* At least one line of therapy between the end of first-line anti-EGFR administration and screening.
* Availability of plasma sample for liquid biopsy within 28 days prior enrolment.
* RAS (codons 12, 13, 59, 61, 117 and 146 of KRAS and NRAS genes) and BRAF (V600E mutation) wt status of ct-DNA at screening (central laboratory assessment by means of IdyllaTM ctKRAS-NRAS-BRAF Mutation Test).
* Written informed consent to study treatment and procedures.
* Life expectancy of at least 12 weeks.
* Availability of archival tumour tissue (primary tumour and metastases or at least one of the two) for biomarker analysis.
* Availability of biological samples for translational molecular analyses.
* Neutrophils …
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.