IVUS Study for SV Graft: Y-composite vs Aortocoronary Conduit (NCT04782492) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
IVUS Study for SV Graft: Y-composite vs Aortocoronary Conduit
South Korea50 participantsStarted 2021-07-08
Plain-language summary
Left internal thoracic artery (LITA) has been acknowledged as the first graft of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, it is still not conclusive which one is the best second graft of choice among right internal thoracic artery, radial artery, right gastroepiploic artery, saphenous vein, and etc., as well as its configuration for CABG.
In our institution, saphenous vein has been primarily used for the second graft and we have harvested it with 'No touch technique'. We have been demonstrated the excellent long-term patency of this 'No touch saphenous vein' in many studies. However, it is still unknown which configuration is the better strategy for the saphenous vein as a Y-composite graft based on the left internal thoracic artery versus an aortocoronary conduit. Thus, we aimed to evaluate morphologic change of saphenous vein graft by 1-year intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) study and angiographic patency results between Y-composite graft and aortocoronary conduit.
Who can participate
Age range
19 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* A patient who is going to receive coronary artery bypass grafting
* Older than 19 years
* Coronary artery bypass grafting is going to be performed with left internal thoracic artery and saphenous vein graft
Exclusion Criteria:
* Other concomitant procedures (e.g. valve or aorta surgery) is planned
* Patients with severe comorbidities which limit the life expectancy of them below 1 year (e.g. terminal cancer)
* Patients whose left internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein is not available due to the low quality, severe injury, or absence of the graft
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.