The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiographic success rates of indirect pulp treatment (IPT) performed by combining 2% chlorhexidine gluconate with mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) versus IPT performed with MTA in children's vital primary molars. A randomized, split-mouth design including 40 children aged 4-8 years was implemented. The study sample composed of 80 primary molars with deep carious lesions. Each child had 1 pair, one tooth from each pair was allocated randomly either to the 2% chlorhexidine gluconate/MTA group or the MTA group. All teeth were restored with stainless steel crowns. Follow-up is carried out to evaluate the teeth clinically and radiographically.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Data Recording Sheet for Intraoral Clinical Examination
Timeframe: 12 months
Data Recording Sheet for Periapical Radiographic Evaluation
Timeframe: 12 months