"Effects of Piezocision vs Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction (NCT04743700) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
"Effects of Piezocision vs Micro-osteoperforations on the Rate of Maxillary Canine Retraction
India20 participantsStarted 2020-12-25
Plain-language summary
Acceleration of orthodontic tooth movement persuades tremendous rise in the interest of adolescents and aduts, as it not only shortens the treatment duration but also lessens the incidence of white spot lesions, root resorption, periodontal and other soft tissue problems. Minimal invasive techniques i.e.both piezocision and micro-osteoperforations had promising results in accelerating tooth movement. Therefore current study will provide evidence for better minimal invasive technique in terms of reducing treatment time and patient comfort.
Who can participate
Age range16 Years – 25 Years
SexALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
✓. Patients with age between 16-25 years
✓. Patients with Angle's class II division 1 malocclusion requiring bilateral extraction of maxillary first premolars.
✓. Overjet of ≤ 10mm
✓. No debilitating systemic disease.
✓. No radiographic evidence of bone loss.
✓. No history of periodontal disease/ therapy.
✓. No smoking habit.
✓. Probing depth of not more than 3mm in all teeth.
Exclusion criteria
✕. Presence of any signs and symptoms of gingival and periodontal diseases.
✕. Overjet more than 10mm.
✕. Long-term drug history.
What they're measuring
1
Measurement of rate of canine retraction
Timeframe: 4th week
2
Measurement of rate of canine retraction
Timeframe: 8th week
3
Measurement of rate of canine retraction
Timeframe: 12th week
4
Measurement of rate of canine retraction
Timeframe: 16th week
Trial details
NCT IDNCT04743700
SponsorPostgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak