The purpose of the study is to investigate the effects of a psychoeducational intervention program, Illness Management and Recovery (henceforth abbreviated as IMR), when administered to inpatient forensic mental health patients. IMR is a treatment program that can be administered in both a group and an individual format. It is designed for persons suffering from severe mental health problems and has two principal aims: 1. promoting participants´ capacity to manage and alleviate symptoms and functional impairment and 2. helping participants in formulating and attaining subjectively meaningful recovery goals. Forensic mental health inpatients receiving this treatment will be compared to patients who receive treatment as usual on a variety of outcome measures, such as clinician and self-rated levels of symptoms, function and perceived levels of hope. Furthermore, clinicians' experiences of working with the intervention will be investigated using a structured questionnaire regarding implementation processes and through an interview protocol. The study has 3 objectives: 1. Investigating the effects of the treatment on the chosen outcome measures. 2. Investigating the effects of potential moderators on treatment outcome. These moderators include: pre-treatment functional status measured by self and informant report, neuropsychological performance and pre-admission indicators of presence of criminogenic risk factors and everyday functioning. 3. Investigating the experiences of staff working with the intervention, through the lense of Normalization Process Theory.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Health of Nation Outcome Scale-Secure version (HoNOS-S) (change from baseline levels to post treatment, estimated approximately 9 months after baseline).
Timeframe: This comparison will be made between HoNOS ratings in treatment and control group taken before treatment commencement and directly following treatment completion (estimated 9 months in between)
World Health Organizations Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 36-item version, interview administered. (change from baseline levels to post treatment estimated 9 months after baseline).
Timeframe: This comparison will be made between WHODAS ratings in treatment and control group taken before treatment commencement and directly following treatment completion (estimated 9 months in between)