An Efficacy and Safety Study of 24 Week Treatment With Mavodelpar (REN001) in Primary Mitochondri… (NCT04535609) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedPhase 2
An Efficacy and Safety Study of 24 Week Treatment With Mavodelpar (REN001) in Primary Mitochondrial Myopathy Patients
United States, Australia, Belgium213 participantsStarted 2021-05-21
Plain-language summary
This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group, multi-centre, study designed to investigate the efficacy and safety of REN001 administered once daily over a 24-week period to patients with PMM.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Subjects age 18 years or older with PMM as defined by the International Workshop: Outcome measures and clinical trial readiness in primary mitochondrial myopathies in children and adult (Mancuso et al 2017).
. A confirmed PMM diagnosis due to known pathogenic gene mutation or deletion of the mitochondrial genome. The Sponsor may authorize local genetic testing at Screening, if required, but results must be available prior to randomization of the subject.
. Documented PMM primarily characterized by exercise intolerance or active muscle pain.
. Subjects must be ambulatory and able to perform the walking tests independently (walking aids are allowed).
. Have no changes to any therapeutic exercise regimen within 30 days prior to Day 1 and be willing to remain on the same therapeutic exercise regimen for the duration of the study.
. Females should be either of non-child-bearing potential or must agree to use highly effective methods of contraception from Screening through to 30 days after last dose in the study. Males with partners who are WOCBP must also use contraception.
. Concomitant medications (including supplements) must be stable for at least 1 month prior to enrolment and throughout participation in the study.
. Evidence of a personally signed and dated informed consent document indicating that the subject has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
Exclusion criteria
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Change in Distance Walked During a 12 Minute Walk Test
. Participation in a prior REN001 (previously known as HPP-593) study.
. Currently taking or anticipated to need a PPAR agonist during the study.
. Subjects with bone deformities or motor abnormalities other than related to the mitochondrial myopathy that may interfere with the outcome measures.
. Clinically significant kidney disease or impairment calculated as eGFR Grade 2 or above \<60ml/min/1.73m2 using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation at Screening.
. Clinically significant liver disease or impairment of AST or ALT Grade 2 or above (\>2.5 x ULN), or Total bilirubin \> 1.6 x ULN or \>ULN with other signs and symptoms of hepatotoxicity at Screening.
. Subjects with uncontrolled diabetes and/or a Screening HbA1c of ≥11%.
. Evidence of significant concomitant clinical disease that may need a change in management during the study or could interfere with the conduct or safety of this study. (Stable well-controlled chronic conditions such hypercholesterolemia, gastroesophageal reflux, or depression under control with medication (other than tricyclic antidepressants), are acceptable provided the symptoms and medications would not be predicted to compromise safety or interfere with the tests and interpretations of this study.)
. Subjects with a history of cancer. A history of in situ basal cell carcinoma in the skin is allowed.