UnknownPhase 4

Evaluation of Clinical Efficacy of Different Injection Therapies for Treating Humeral Epicondylopathy

Poland120 participantsStarted 2021-02-01

Plain-language summary

Humeral epicondylopathies are common disorders which can significantly impair upper limb function. In case of failure of rehabilitation protocol there is no evidence based second line therapy. It is common practice to perform one of the injection procedures. The biological mechanisms of these procedures are unclear, and may even be contrary. These include, but are not limited to, injections of corticosteroids, autologous platelet rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA). Despite the frequent use there is much controversy about their clinical effectiveness and more evidence based data are required. The aim of the study is to compare three different injection therapies for lateral epicondylopathy. In addition, correlation between selected bioactive compounds in PRP and its clinical effectiveness will be evaluated. The study is planned as a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial on 120 patients aged 30-60 who suffer for lateral epicondylitis. After meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria patients will receive an injection of leukocyte-rich autologous PRP (N1), corticosteroid (N2), HA (N3) in the area of the common extensors tendon attachment, respectively. Patients from control group (N4) will get an injection of saline in the same area. All groups will be instructed how to perform everyday stretching and strengthening exercises. Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of the treatment will be based on objective measurements such as range of motion, limb girth, grip strength, X-ray and ultrasound examination and subjective measurements such as pain (VAS), functional (PRTEE, DASH, SEV, MEPS) and quality of life questionnaires (SF-36) before and during follow-up period (1, 4, 12, 24, 52 weeks). PRP samples will undergo laboratory analysis of levels of bioactive compounds including platelets, white blood cells, erythrocytes and selected growth factors and inflammatory cytokines. After data collection, the clinical effectiveness of three different injection therapies will be evaluated and statistically analyzed. Subjective and objective outcomes, safety, costs-effectiveness of three different injection therapies compared to placebo and between each other will be assessed. In addition, correlation between levels of bioactive compounds in PRP and its efficacy will be checked.

Who can participate

Age range

30 Years – 60 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * pain on the lateral side of the elbow joint for at least three months, * confirmation of lateral epicondylitis in at least one provocative test, * no previous invasive treatment, * no improvement after rehabilitation Exclusion Criteria: * nervous system diseases related to the upper limb, * hematological diseases, * diabetes, * tumors of upper extremity, * gout, * advanced osteoarthritis, * previously performed operations around the elbow joint, * suspicion of the infectious process, * pregnant

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Change in pain level assessed by Visual Analog Scale

Timeframe: 0, 1, 4, 12, 24, 52 weeks

Change in functional outcome assessed by Patient-rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation

Timeframe: 0, 4, 12, 24, 52 weeks

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04521387

SponsorWroclaw Medical University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2022-05-01

Contact for this trial

Maciej Dejnek

793999245 maciej.dejnek@student.umed.wroc.pl

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Elbow Tendinopathy trials