During military action there might be situations where civil requirements for blood transfusion are not obtainable. Numerous warfare experiences suggest that administration of whole blood to a patient with uncontrollable bleeding/bleeding shock will improve survival in case of delayed evacuation. Among Norwegian troops this gives one of two choices: 1. A soldier donates blood to a wounded fellow soldier 2. Personnel in safe distance donates blood and it is transported to the frontline. Alternative b might implicate frequent donations and unused blood must be auto-re-transfused. This study will investigate: 1. Can 'buddy transfusion' in the field be justified also in medical aspects? 2. Can repeated donations and auto-transfusions of transported whole blood into personnel(X) be justified also in medical aspects? (X) Blood typed and screened for HIV, HBV, HCV, Syphilis before assignment
Age range
18 Years – 40 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Number of hits
Timeframe: Pre- and postdonation