UnknownNot Applicable

Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforation

Italy200 participantsStarted 2017-01-01

Plain-language summary

Although laparoscopic repair (LR) of perforated peptic ulcers (PPUs) has long been accepted, clinical evidence comparing LR versus open repair (OR) remains lacking. The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety and outcome of laparoscopic gastric repair and compare it with the outcome open repair by relying on a propensity score matching statistical technique

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients surgically treated for benign peptic ulcer perforation Exclusion Criteria: * Age \< 18 years * Pregnant and breastfeeding women * Malignant ulcer perforation * Gastric resection * Diagnostic laparoscopy/laparotomy with no further surgical procedures performed

What they're measuring

30-day Mortality Rate

Timeframe: 18 months

30-day Morbidity Rate

Timeframe: 18 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04447170

SponsorGianluca Costa

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2021-11-30

Contact for this trial

Gianluca Costa, MD, PhD

00393921119067 gianlucacostaphd@gmail.com

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Surgery trials