UnknownNot Applicable

Validity of Fluorescence-Based Devices Versus Visual-Tactile Method in Detection of Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations: Invivo Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Egypt30 participantsStarted 2020-09-21

Plain-language summary

This study will be conducted to evaluate the clinical performance and validity of both light-induced fluorescence intraoral camera and laser-induced fluorescence device in comparison to visual-tactile assessment method in detection of secondary caries around margins of resin composite restorations.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 60 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Patients should be over 18 years of age. * Patients should have an acceptable oral hygiene level. * Patients should have at least one resin composite restoration. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients with a compromised medical history. * Patients with active severe periodontal disease.

What they're measuring

Validity of Fluorescence-based Devices versus Visual-tactile method

Timeframe: Through study completion, an average of 5 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04426604

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-09

Contact for this trial

Aya Mohamed Adly Ibrahim, Master's Degree

+201221528843 aya.mohamed@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Secondary Caries Around Resin Composite Restorations trials