UnknownNot Applicable

Intervetional Lay Open and Curettage Versus Endoscopic (E.P.Si.T) Method in the Treatment of Sacrococcygeal Pilonidal Sinus Disease

Egypt30 participantsStarted 2020-06-12

Plain-language summary

Aim of the work To compare lay open technique versus Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment as regards recurrence rate, operative data, postoperative pain, intra and postoperative complications, healing time and return to daily activity

Who can participate

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Adult patients of both genders with symptoms from sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus were included in our study. Exclusion Criteria: * Abscess formation 2. Immunodeficiency. 3. Patients with congenital asymptomatic pits. 4. Patient with psychiatric disease disabling surgical intervention. 5. Pregnant females

What they're measuring

recurrence rate

Timeframe: one year

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04418310

SponsorMansoura University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-06

Contact for this trial

Mohamed Arnouse

01099222561 drmhamdy@mans.edu.eg

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus trials