The aim of the present study is to evaluate both Hall technique and atraumatic restorative technique in comparison to the conventional restorative technique in the management of carious lesions in primary molars.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Success of the crown (for Hall and conventional techniques)
Timeframe: 1 week
Success of the crown (for Hall and conventional techniques)
Timeframe: 1 month
Success of the crown (for Hall and conventional techniques)
Timeframe: 6 months
Success of the crown (for Hall and conventional techniques)
Timeframe: 12 months
Success of the atraumatic restorative technique
Timeframe: 1 week
Success of the atraumatic restorative technique
Timeframe: 1 month
Success of the atraumatic restorative technique
Timeframe: 6 months
Success of the atraumatic restorative technique
Timeframe: 12 months
Treatment (restoration) survival
Timeframe: 1 week
Treatment (restoration) survival
Timeframe: 1 month
Treatment (restoration) survival
Timeframe: 6 months
Treatment (restoration) survival
Timeframe: 12 months
Radiographic evaluation of the treatment
Timeframe: 6 months
Radiographic evaluation of the treatment
Timeframe: 12 months