CompletedNot Applicable

Effectiveness of Nasal-alar Elevator Combined With Taping Vs. Taping Alone on Improving the Nose Esthetics and Maxillary Arch Dimensions in Infants With Unilateral Complete Cleft Lip and Palate

Egypt32 participantsStarted 2020-07-09

Plain-language summary

This randomized trial is designed to assess the effectiveness of nasal elevator as a presurgical infant orthopedics on improvement of nose esthetics vs taping alone.

Who can participate

Age range1 Day – 30 Days

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Infants with age range from 1-30 days. * Unilateral complete cleft lip and alveolus. * Medically free subjects. * Both males and females. * Cleft gap more than 10 mm. Exclusion Criteria: * Patients older than 30 days. * Syndromic patients with other defects in addition to cleft lip and palate. * Patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate. * Incomplete Cleft lip. * Patient with previous surgical lip repair or adhesion. * Patients with previous presurgical infant orthopedic treatment. * Medically compromised patients. * Cleft gap distance less than 10mm

What they're measuring

Nasal Esthetics

Timeframe: 3 months

Maxillary arch changes

Timeframe: 3 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04331379

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-12-30

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Cleft Lip and Palate trials