This study evaluates the effect of non-invasive high frequency oscillations applied via a highflow nasal cannula ('Osciflow') compared to highflow nasal cannula without oscillations (HF) on desaturations and bradycardia in premature infants. It uses a crossover design. Infants are randomized to begin the study with either Osciflow or HF. Both modes are applied for 4 hours. Infants are monitored with an oximetry sensor to measure peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) and pulse rate, and with a transcutaneous CO2-transducer. Further measurements include respiratory rate and 'Bernese pain scale' evaluated by nursing staff and Electrical Impedance Tomography (EIT) in a subset of patients.
Age range
3 Days
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Paired difference in the total number of desaturations and bradycardia between Osciflow and HF
Timeframe: 180-minute recording periods for each therapy