Optimal Timing of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - The TAVI PCI Trial

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1. 1Since this trial is comparing different timing approaches for doing TAVI and PCI together — such as whether the procedures are done at the same time or staged separately — which approach is my doctor currently leaning toward for me, and what are the potential risks of each option?
2. 2This trial is listed as 'active not recruiting,' meaning they're no longer enrolling new patients — does that affect my ability to participate, and are there similar studies still open that my doctor would recommend looking into?
3. 3Because this trial involves both a heart valve procedure (TAVI) and a coronary artery procedure (PCI), how does combining or sequencing these two interventions affect my overall recovery time and risk compared to standard care?
4. 4The trial doesn't specify a traditional phase, which suggests it may be more about comparing existing accepted procedures than testing a brand-new treatment — does my doctor think one timing approach already has enough evidence to guide my care, or is the uncertainty real enough that a trial like this matters for my decision?
5. 5Given that I have both aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease, how would my doctor weigh the option of enrolling in a trial like this against simply following whatever timing approach they already consider best practice for my specific situation?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.