Stopped: The sponsor's decision to stop the study follows the DSMB's recommendations (end of enrolment and experimental treatment, post-treatment/end-of-study visit within 3 months of stopping treatment), regarding the benefit-risk balance.
* Long-term aspirin (ASA) is the standard recommended antithrombotic therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD), especially following stenting (Class I, Level A). * Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the standard antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with one or more risk factor for stroke (Class I, Level A). * During the first year following acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), several studies evaluating the combination of OAC treatment and antiplatelet therapy are either already published or ongoing. * At distance of the index ACS and/or PCI, patients with stable CAD and concomitant AF remain at particular high-risk of ischemic (3 to 4 times higher as compared to patients with stable CAD without AF) and bleeding events. Antithrombotic management of these patients is subsequently highly challenging in clinical practice. The European task force suggests that the use of a full-dose anticoagulant monotherapy without any antiplatelet therapy should be the default strategy in such patients with both, AF and stable CAD. * However, evidences are sparse and weak to support such a strategy (only observational studies with many biases) and no randomized trial has assessed this question. These patients, especially those at high-risk of recurrent ischemic events (post- ACS, diabetes, multivessel CAD…) may benefit from the combination of OAC and aspirin at long-term. Indeed the crude event rate of ischemic events is much higher than the crude event rate of bleeding in this specific population. Ischemic events are 2 to 3 times more frequent than bleeding in daily practice. * The benefit/risk ratio of these two different strategies (ASA in combination with OAC vs. OAC alone) in patients at high-risk of recurrent coronary and vascular events remains unknown. Dual therapy with full-dose anticoagulation and ASA may lead to higher risk of major bleeding, while stopping ASA in stabilized high-risk patients after PCI may lead to poorer outcome regarding ischemic events. * The coordinating investigators therefore designed a double blind placebo controlled trial in order to assess the optimal antithrombotic regimen that should be pursued long-life in this subset of patients.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Primary efficacy outcome : rate of composite of cardiovascular mortality and thrombotic cardiovascular events
Timeframe: within 24-48 months
Primary safety outcome : rate of major bleeding
Timeframe: within 24-48 months