A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy (NCT04217239) | Clinical Trial Compass
CompletedNot Applicable
A Comparison Between Ivor-Lewis and McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy
China272 participantsStarted 2020-01-01
Plain-language summary
Surgery is still the main treatment for esophageal cancer, however, the complication and mortality rate of open esophagectomy is high. As a result, the thoracoscopic- laparoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was developed. The MIE mainly comprised two surgical approaches:
MIE McKeown approach (cervical anastomosis) and MIE Ivor-Lewis approach (intrathoracicanastomosis). The MIE with intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor-Lewis) is increasingly used for the treatment of mid and lower esophageal cancers. Our study is trying to compare the safety, feasibility, and short-term and long- term outcomes between MIE Ivor-Lewis approach and MIE McKeown approach for the treatment of lower thoracic esophageal cancer and esophageal- gastric junction.
Who can participate
Age range
30 Years – 80 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
(I) Patients with clinically staged T1-3N0-2M0 tumors; good cardiopulmonary function;
(II) Patients with lower thoracic esophageal tumors and esophageal- gastric junction tumor;
(III) Patients without a previous history of cancer;
(IV) Patients without a previous history of neck or chest surgery;
Exclusion Criteria:
(I) cardiopulmonary function not good enough for surgery;
(II) Patients with hybrid MIE
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.