CompletedNot Applicable

ERAS vs Conventional Approach in Peptic Perforation-RCT

India60 participantsStarted 2020-01-20

Plain-language summary

This study compares 2 different ways of perioperative management in patients of peptic perforation. Experimental arm is the ERAS arm( Enhanced recovery after surgery) and the comparative arm is Conventional arm.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Patient diagnosed with peptic perforation intra -operatively
✓. Perforation of size \<=1 cm
✓. Patient age more than 18 years
✓. American Society of Anesthesiologists score of I or II

Exclusion criteria

✕. Refractory septic shock at presentation.
✕. Known Chronic kidney disease/ Chronic liver disease patients
✕. Pregnant patients.
✕. Patients with history of chronic steroid abuse.
✕. Intraoperatively
✕. Patient requiring Positive Pressure Ventilator support post operatively for more than 12 hours.
✕. Patient requiring urinary catheterization for other indications.
✕. Coexistent neurological or psychiatric illness or unable to understand the study.

What they're measuring

Length of hospital stay

Timeframe: Post operative period up-to one month.

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04194060

SponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2021-05-15

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Peptic Ulcer Perforation trials