TerminatedNot Applicable

Comparison of Non-invasive Vs. Invasive Hemodynamic Measurements

Stopped: Study was terminated due to inability of clinical site to enroll sufficient number of subjects

United States8 participantsStarted 2020-01-16

Plain-language summary

Comparison of a non-invasive method of measuring central venous pressure to the conventional modality of invasive central venous pressure.

Age range18 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

✓. Adult age over 18 years.
✓. Arm circumference is 23 cm to 55 cm
✓. Subject will have an existing central venous catheter during their ICU stay
✓. Subject or legally authorized representative (LAR) is able to understand the risks and potential benefits of participating in the study and is willing to provide written informed consent
✓. Subject or LAR is willing and able to comply with protocol procedures

✕. Finger and/or upper arm anatomical anomaly or disease that may interfere with attaching a pulse oximeter sensor and/or blood pressure cuff.
✕. Pregnant (self-reported)
✕. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis currently being treated
✕. Severe skin disease involving the upper arm(s)
✕. Study investigator may exclude patients based on clinical judgement

Non-invasive pressure indicator

Timeframe: 12-72 hours

NCT IDNCT04180202

SponsorNihon Kohden

Sponsor typeINDUSTRY

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2022-06-20