CompletedNot Applicable

Establishing a Normative Database in Pediatric Population of the Head-mounted visuALL Field Analyzer

United States50 participantsStarted 2020-06-15

Plain-language summary

The goal of this study is to determine reference values of the VisuALL Field Test in pediatric population. Standard Automatic Perimetry (SAP) is the gold standard test for the evaluation of different diseases of the visual pathway like glaucoma. Its main goal is to measure the differential light sensitivity at several locations in the central field of vision. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the current devices is limited by several factors such as the inherent inconsistency of the psychophysical test, stressful examinations and frequency of testing. Several devices have been developed since the advent of the Octopus Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer (HFA) in an effort to improve the early detection of glaucoma. Several of these visual field test variants are implemented using laptops, iPads, and virtual reality headsets. These modalities bring portability but lack fixation methods, environmental control, and hardware standardization. These deficiencies may limit their wide usage. The main goal of this study is to develop an initial pediatric reference database of a novel visual field test ecosystem that takes advantage of a Head Mounted Device (HMD).

Who can participate

Age range

8 Years – 18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * No history of intraocular surgery * Best corrected visual acuity (BVCA) 20/25 or better in each eye Exclusion Criteria: * A spherical refraction outside ± 5.0 D and cylinder correction outside 2.0 D. * Intraocular surgery in the study eye * History of systemic condition known to affect visual function. * History of medication known to affect visual function.

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Retinal sensitivity

Timeframe: End of the recruitment phase, average 3 months

Mean retinal sensitivity

Timeframe: End of the recruitment phase, average 3 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04175444

SponsorVanderbilt University Medical Center

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2020-07-01

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Visual Field Defect, Peripheral trials