TerminatedPhase 3

SAR408701 Versus Docetaxel in Previously Treated, Carcinoembryonic Antigen-related Cell Adhesion Molecule 5 (CEACAM5) Positive Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small-cell Lung Cancer Patients

Stopped: Sponsor decision, the decision is not related to any safety concern.

United States, Argentina, Australia389 participantsStarted 2020-02-06

Plain-language summary

Primary Objectives: * Study was designed with multiple primary endpoints analyzed on randomized participants at the time of the cut-off date for each given analysis (progression free survival \[PFS\] and overall survival \[OS\]) * Study success was defined either on PFS or OS * The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the progression free survival (PFS) when compared to docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) * The primary objective was to determine whether tusamitamab ravtansine improves the overall survival (OS) when compared with docetaxel in participants with metastatic non-squamous NSCLC expressing CEACAM5 greater than or equal to 2+ in intensity in at least 50% of the tumor cell population and previously treated with standard-of-care platinum-based chemotherapy and an immune checkpoint inhibitor. Secondary Objectives: * Compared the objective response rate (ORR) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel * Compared the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of tusamitamab ravtansine with docetaxel * Evaluated the safety of tusamitamab ravtansine compared to docetaxel * Assessed the duration of response (DOR) of tusamitamab ravtansine as compared with docetaxel

Who can participate

Age range

18 Years

Sex

ALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * At least 18 years of age or above (or country's legal age of maturity if above 18 years) and signed the informed consent. * Histologically or cytologically proven diagnosis of non-squamous NSCLC with metastatic disease at study entry; progression after platinum-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor. * Participants with carcinoembryonic antigen-related cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM) 5 expression of greater than or equal to 2+ in archival tumor sample (or if not available, fresh biopsy sample) involving at least 50% of the tumor cell population as demonstrated prospectively by central laboratory via immune histochemistry (IHC). * At least one measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1 as determined by local site investigator /radiologist assessment. * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1. * A female participant who agreed to use highly effective contraceptive methods during and for at least 7 months after the last dose of study intervention. * A male participant who agreed to use highly effective contraception methods during and for at least 6 months after the last dose of study intervention. Exclusion Criteria: * Participants with untreated brain metastases and history of leptomeningeal disease. if previously treated brain metastases no documentation of non-progressive disease in brain by imaging performed at least 4 weeks after CNS directed treatment and at least 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study intervention. * …

Questions worth asking your doctor

Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.

1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?

Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.

Questions for the trial coordinator

The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.

1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?

A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.

What they're measuring

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Timeframe: Tumor assessments performed at screening, and every 8 weeks +/-5 days thereafter, up to 189 weeks

Overall Survival (OS)

Timeframe: From date of first study treatment administration (Day 1) until the date of death due to any cause, up to 189 weeks

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04154956

SponsorSanofi

Sponsor typeINDUSTRY

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-09-22

Results submitted2024-09-12

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Metastatic trials