UnknownPhase 2/3

Recanalization of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction by Endodiathermy Probe and Intubation Versus Intubation Only

Egypt80 participantsStarted 2020-03

Plain-language summary

The purpose of the current work is to assess the efficiency and success rate of endodiathermy probe followed by intubation in children more than 2 years compared to the success rate of intubation (as a standard method) which varies from 75% to 85% in several studies

Who can participate

Age range2 Years – 7 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion criteria

✓. Children in the age group above 2 years old
✓. No history of previous probing.
✓. No history of previous intubation.
✓. Children with no any other association or congenital anomalies cause watery eye.
✓. children suffer from congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Exclusion criteria

✕. children less than 2 years old.
✕. previous probing.
✕. previous intubation.
✕. children with any other congenital anomalies as congenital ectropion , congenital entropion
✕. children suffer from any upper lacrimal anomalies as obstruction or stenosis.

What they're measuring

recanalization of nasolacrimal duct

Timeframe: 6 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04148170

SponsorCairo University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2020-06

Contact for this trial

mohamed hafez ibrahim

00201224010523 monsieur84@yahoo.com

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction trials