Infection of the ascitic fluid is a serious complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. This fluid is often colonized with bacteria that can cause infection of the peritoneum and possibly sepsis. Many bacteria of the human intestinal microbiome can't be cultured by standard methods; therefore it seems likely that many of the relevant bacteria are not discovered in routine diagnostics, but may be relevant to pathogenesis. Culture-independent approaches such as NGS (Next generation Sequencing) have in principle made it possible to study or prove complex microbial colonization. Because NGS is a relatively new technology, microbiological diagnostic protocols need to be further customized and refined to integrate with the standard diagnostic workflow, if necessary. For microbiological diagnostics, material is collected from the appropriate ascites patients and sent for microbiological diagnostics. Afterwards the cultural diagnostics are carried out as part of the patient care at the university hospital. In this study the investigators plan to use these samples to analyze and compare the presence of bacteria by NGS in parallel to the culture diagnostics, and then compare it to the patients' gut microbiome, to understand the possible effect of the microbiome on ascites pathogenesis and outcome.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
The comparative assessment of about 50 patients
Timeframe: 12-18 Months