CompletedNot Applicable

Microdecompression Versus Open Laminectomy and Posterior Stabilization for Multilevel Lumbar Spine Stenosis

100 participantsStarted 2016-01-03

Plain-language summary

This study compare the results of 2 methods in surgical treatment of Lumbar spine stenosis.These are microdecompresssion and open decompression with posterior stabilization. 100 patients are involved in this study who divided in 2 groups.Each group was treated with one method and follow up done which showed both method are effective with better results in those patients treated with microdecomppression.

Who can participate

Age range41 Years – 66 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * patients were suffered from back pain of different degrees with spinal claudication Exclusion Criteria: * Smoking * Diabetic patients, * Previous spinal surgery, * any neuromuscular disorder like poliomyelitis, and * vertebral instability proved by Dynamic plain radiographs

What they're measuring

Oswestry disability index

Timeframe: It was measured at 12 months after operation

Visual analoge score

Timeframe: It was measured at 12 months after operation

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04087694

SponsorHawler Medical University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2018-10-04

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Lumbar Spinal Stenosis trials