Background. Blue lenses that filter out red light have been proposed as a new therapeutic alternative for patients with PSE, such as the lens Zeiss Clarlet Z1. This lens only allows a small overall quantity of visible light, and particularly a minimum percentage of red light, to pass through. However, these characteristics entail two main pitfalls: reduced applicability in high- latitude regions and lack of transmission for the red and yellow colors. The latter would mainly expose patients to the other colors that compose the visible light, and particularly to the blue visible light. This exposure might be damaging for their eyes in the long term, as it has been reported in some studies. Aim. To determine whether four new lenses with different spectral characteristics are not inferior in efficacy to Z1 to reduce the PPRs in patients with PSE. Participants. Patients between 5-18 years with suspected or confirmed PSE, referred to the Neurophysiology Service at Birmingham Children's Hospital (BCH) for an EEG with IPS/pattern stimulation. Objectives \& Outcomes: 1.A) Primary Objective: To evaluate the reduction/suppression produced by four new lenses in the PPRs shown by patients with PSE during an EEG with IPS/pattern stimulation, and compare it with the reduction provoked by the Z1 lens in the same individuals. 1. B) Primary Outcome: reduction/suppression in both the PPR and the standardized photoparoxysmal response range (SPR) for IPS and pattern stimulation. 2. A) Secondary Objectives: * To obtain feedback from the patients who acquire a pair of our lenses regarding tolerability, overall adherence to treatment and improvement in the quality of life. * Comparison of the reduction/suppression in the PPRs between our lenses and the Z1 lens in those retrospective patients with PSE seen between 2008-2017 at the Aston Brain Center. 2.B) Secondary Outcomes: * Mean score obtained in adherence to treatment, tolerability, reduction in seizure frequency and autonomy according to the patient/parents or carers satisfaction questionnaires. * Reduction/suppression in both the PPR and the standardized photoparoxysmal response range (SPR) for IPS and pattern stimulation in those patients recruited at the Aston Brain Center.
Age range
5 Years – 18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
PPR change
Timeframe: Baseline (First visit T0)
SPR change
Timeframe: Baseline (First visit T0)