UnknownNot Applicable

Minimally Invasive Locking Plate Fixation vs Reamed Intramedullary Nail Fixation on Patients With Open Tibia Fracture

300 participantsStarted 2020-06

Plain-language summary

The best treatment for the open tibia fractures remains controversial. It is unknown whether minimally invasive locking plate or reamed intramedullary nail fixation will result in lower complication rates and better function.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 60 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: * Ages 18 - 60 years inclusive * Open diaphyseal fracture * Gustilo-Anderson Type I, II, IIIA Exclusion Criteria: * Closed, periarticular or pathological fracture * Gustilo-Anderson Type IIIB,IIIC * Patients with concomitant fractures in the ipsilateral limb * The patient is unable to medically tolerate general anesthesia * The patient is unable to provide informed consent or comply with completing questionnaires * Tibia already infected as diagnosed by a surgeon * The patient has been diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition

What they're measuring

LEFS

Timeframe: 12 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT04072094

SponsorSecond Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeINTERVENTIONAL

Primary completion2023-06

Contact for this trial

Zhao-ming Ye, MD

+86-571-87783553 2192002@zju.edu.cn

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Open tíbia Fracture trials