Stopped: Slow enrolment during the COVID pandemics
The present study is a monocentric, observational, single arm, study, with the aim to determinate the ability of FFR-CT to exclude or confirm the presence of hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis, compared to coronary angiography in high-risk acute coronary syndrome patients.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Negative predictive value of FFR-CT to detect the absence of hemodynamically significant stenosis, compared to angiography (with FFR in case of lesion with at least a 30% stenosis) in high risk ACS patients
Timeframe: Through inclusion completion, expected after 18 months of enrolment
Accuracy of FFR-CT to detect hemodynamically significant stenosis, compared to angiography (with FFR in case of lesion with at least a 30% stenosis) in high risk ACS patients
Timeframe: Through inclusion completion, expected after 18 months of enrolment
Sensitivity of FFR-CT to detect hemodynamically significant stenosis, compared to angiography (with FFR in case of lesion with at least a 30% stenosis) in high risk ACS patients
Timeframe: Through inclusion completion, expected after 18 months of enrolment
Specificity of FFR-CT to detect hemodynamically significant stenosis, compared to angiography (with FFR in case of lesion with at least a 30% stenosis) in high risk ACS patients
Timeframe: Through inclusion completion, expected after 18 months of enrolment
Positive predictive value of FFR-CT to detect hemodynamically significant stenosis, compared to angiography (with FFR in case of lesion with at least a 30% stenosis) in high risk ACS patients
Timeframe: Through inclusion completion, expected after 18 months of enrolment