Clinical Performance of MTA Cavity Lining in the Treatment of Deep Caries Lesions (NCT04018716) | Clinical Trial Compass
UnknownNot Applicable
Clinical Performance of MTA Cavity Lining in the Treatment of Deep Caries Lesions
73 participantsStarted 2015-07-07
Plain-language summary
Aim of this clinical study is to compare the clinical success of two lining materials regarding the maintenance of pulp vitality in the treatment of deep caries lesions over 4- years.
A hundred permanent premolar and molars with deep caries lesions without pulp involvement (aged between 18 and 30 years) in 73 patients were randomly divided into the following groups: calcium hydroxide cement (Ca(OH)2) (Dycal, Dentsply/Caulk, Dentsply International Inc, Milford, DE, USA) group and mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) (Dentsplay, Tulsa Dental, Johnson city, USA) group. Final restoration with a resin-based composite (Gradia Direct Posterior, GC, Tokyo, Japan) in a single session was performed. The following-up period was 6-, 12-, 24-, 36- and 48-months. Two calibrated examiners performed the clinical examination of the pulpal symptoms
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years – 30 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion criteria
. Primary deep caries lesion with risk of pulp exposure (radiograph depth reaching 3/4 of the dentin).
. Restorable by direct restoration and functional permanent posterior teeth,
. Positive response to electric pulp testing and negative response to thermal testing.
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.