Evaluation of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Phenylephrine Response During Refractory Septic Shock (NCT03953677) | Clinical Trial Compass
TerminatedPhase 3
Evaluation of the Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Phenylephrine Response During Refractory Septic Shock
Stopped: Excess mortality in one arm of the study that led to discontinuation of enrollment
France32 participantsStarted 2019-10-27
Plain-language summary
Septic shock is common in patients admitted to intensive care and hospital mortality occurs in close to 50% of these patients. In half of the cases, death occurs within the first 72 hours in a context of multiple organ failure that does not respond to conventional therapies, particularly circulatory therapies, despite increasing doses of catecholamines. Vasopressor resistance in septic patients defines refractory septic shock. In one study (Conrad et al. 2015), the increase in blood pressure observed with an infusion of increasing doses of phenylephrine (dose-response curve) made it possible to quickly and clearly identify patients resistant to vasopressors at a high risk of death by refractory shock (ROC AUC 0.92). This resistance is due in particular to a downregulation of α1 adrenergic receptors, linked to sympathetic hyper activation associated with septic shock. To date, there is no validated therapy in this situation. However, experimental data have shown that the administration of α2 agonists, usually used for their sedative (dexmedetomidine) or anti-hypertensive (clonidine) effect, normalizes sympathetic activity towards basal values. In animals, α2 agonists restore the sensitivity of alpha1 adrenergic receptors, resulting in improved vasopressor sensitivity and survival. In humans, a beneficial effect on mortality was suggested in the first trial testing dexmedetomidine in septic patients in 2017. This effect was observed especially in the most severe patients, suggesting a restoration of sensitivity to vasopressors.
The hypothesis is that the administration of dexmedetomidine in patients in refractory septic shock may improve response to phenylephrine and decrease resistance to vasopressors. This pilot study could lay the foundation for a randomized controlled trial.
Who can participate
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Inclusion Criteria:
* Age ≥ 18 years old
* Septic shock, defined by the "Sepsis-3" criteria
* proven or suspected infection, with modification of the SOFA score ≥ 2 points,
* with persistent hypotension requiring vasopressors to maintain MAP ≥ 65 mmHg
* and a serum lactate level \> 2 mmol/L despite adequate vascular filling
* Adequate vascular filling: ≥ 30ml/kg, OR absence of preload-dependency criteria at time of assessment (respiratory variability of the inferior vena cava, passive leg lift, pulsed pressure variation)
* Catecholamine resistance, defined by the need for a dose of norepinephrine ≥ 0,5 µg/kg/min for more than 2 consecutive hours within 24 hours of admission to intensive care unit
* persistence of circulatory failure with at least one of the following criteria present in the 2 hours prior to randomisation: hyperlactatemia \> 2mmol/l, and/or mottling (≥ 1 score), and/or oliguria (diuresis \< 0,5 ml/kg/h over the last 2 hours)
* Invasive Mechanical ventilation
* Under sedation by midazolam or propofol
* Informed consent obtained from a relative for patient included in an emergency
* Patient affiliated to the national health insurance system
Exclusion Criteria:
* Cardiac arrest before inclusion and occurring before septic shock criteria are met
* Cardiac index \< 2.2 l/min/m² after volume correction, or left ventricular ejection fraction \< 40% on echocardiography
* Bradycardia \< 55 bpm (apart from treatment with β-blocker) or 2nd or 3rd degree BAV not…
Questions worth asking your doctor
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
1Based on my diagnosis and history, is this trial worth exploring for me — or is there a standard treatment we should try first?
2What does this trial's phase tell us about how much is already known about its safety and benefit?
3What would taking part actually involve for me — visits, tests, time, and travel?
4What are the known and possible risks or side effects I should weigh, and how would they be monitored?
5If this trial isn't the right fit, what other options or trials would you suggest I look into?
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
Questions for the trial coordinator
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
1What does taking part actually involve week to week — how many visits, where, and how long does each one take?
2What costs are covered by the study, and what might I have to pay for myself, including travel, parking, or time off work?
3What happens during screening, and what happens if the study team confirms I don't meet the criteria after those tests?
4Who pays for the scans, blood work, and other tests the trial requires — the study, my insurance, or me?
5How will being in the trial affect my regular care, and will my own doctor stay informed and involved?
6Can I leave the trial at any point if I change my mind, and what would happen to my care if I do?
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
What they're measuring
1
Relative change in mean blood pressure, expressed as a percentage
Timeframe: 6 hours after the end of the initial test