Implementation of 'NAVIGATE' in Ontario aims to help youth and emerging adults suffering from a first episode of psychosis. Although Ontario already has early psychosis intervention programs, the team's recent work has identified major challenges of delivering coordinated care, particularly those elements of care that enhance recovery. These challenges also exist nationally and internationally. By building on the already existing early psychosis intervention community of practice through the Early Psychosis Intervention Ontario Network, the investigators will implement NAVIGATE with the help of CAMH's Provincial System Support Program facilitators. The use of tele-videoconferencing through ECHO Mental Health Ontario and ECHO processes and protocols provide us with an opportunity to ensure sustainability. Using health administrative data held at the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), the investigators can examine system-level outcomes, including hospitalizations, emergency department visits, and outpatient physician visits of youth and emerging adults suffering from a first episode psychosis who are treated with NAVIGATE compared with those treated in early psychosis intervention programs without NAVIGATE and those who are not treated in early psychosis intervention programs. In addition, the investigators can also evaluate health care costs. Prior to initiating this project, the investigators obtained the input of youth and emerging adults with a first episode psychosis and family members. The investigators will also continue to measure engagement across the study. Hypotheses: 1. Following the implementation of NAVIGATE, program fidelity (i.e. adaptability) to the Ontario early psychosis intervention standard will improve. 2. Compared to patients not receiving NAVIGATE, those who receive NAVIGATE through this implementation study will have fewer days in hospital, fewer emergency department visits, fewer suicide attempts, lower mortality, and lower healthcare costs. 3. Improvements in functioning and symptoms will be comparable to the RAISE study (an earlier study assessing NAVIGATE); improvement may be influenced by demographic, socio-economic, geographic, and clinical factors. 4. The project's engagement approach will demonstrate that the investigators used the full range of patient engagement based on objectively assessed engagement metrics.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Hypothesis 1: Fidelity/Adaptability
Timeframe: Exploration stage of implementation [approx. year 1], following implementation [approx. year 2] and end of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 1: Penetration/Scalability
Timeframe: End of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 1: Contextual Factors
Timeframe: End of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 1: Sustainability
Timeframe: Ongoing throughout study [years 2-4 inclusive]
Hypothesis 1: Sustainability
Timeframe: Prior to ECHO participation [approx. year 2] and end of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 1: Affordability
Timeframe: End of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 2: System-Level: Number of psychiatric hospitalization days in the year following NAVIGATE admission
Timeframe: End of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 2: System-Level: Time to first psychiatric hospitalization
Timeframe: End of study [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment for diagnosis
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0, 12, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of clinical psychopathology [BPRS]
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [months 0, 6, 12, 18, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of clinical psychopathology [PHQ-9]
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0, 6, 12, 18, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of clinical psychopathology [QLS]
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0, 6, 12, 18, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of illness severity and improvement
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0, 6, 12, 18, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of functioning [WHODAS 2.0]
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0, 6, 12, 18, 24]
Hypothesis 3: Assessment of parental socio-economic status
Timeframe: Admission to clinic [month 0]
Hypothesis 3: Measurement of Service Utilization
Timeframe: Month 6, 12, 18, 24
Hypothesis 4: Engagement
Timeframe: End of implementation [approx. year 2], Study end [approx. year 4]
Hypothesis 4: Engagement [PPEET/PCORI]
Timeframe: After the first engagement [approx. year 1]. end of implementation [approx. year 2]
Hypothesis 4: Engagement [Interview]
Timeframe: After first engagement [approx. year 1], End of the implementation [approx. year 2], study end [approx. year 4]