Prospective investigation of the effectivity of L-PRF membranes for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (transsphenoidal) versus classical closure techniques.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
To compare the prevalence of CSF-leaks after L-PRF closure and after the classical closure techniques for sellar defects to demonstrate non-inferiority
Timeframe: 4 years
Cost-effectiveness evaluation based on the effectiveness and the costs of L-PRF versus the current golden standard (Tachosil and Tisseel).
Timeframe: 4 years