Prospective investigation of the effectivity of L-PRF membranes for skull base reconstruction after endoscopic endonasal skull base surgery (transsphenoidal) versus classical closure techniques.
Age range
18 Years – 70 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
To compare the prevalence of CSF-leaks after L-PRF closure and after the classical closure techniques for sellar defects to demonstrate non-inferiority
Timeframe: 4 years
Cost-effectiveness evaluation based on the effectiveness and the costs of L-PRF versus the current golden standard (Tachosil and Tisseel).
Timeframe: 4 years