There is limited quality research on the effectiveness of treatments in Bowen's disease (BD). Patient and lesion characteristics, patient preferences and costs should be considered when choosing therapy. Surgical excision (SE), photodynamic therapy (PDT) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) are mentioned as treatment options in guidelines. However no clear and evidence based recommendations are made in terms of effectiveness. Objective: The aim of this study is 1) to evaluate the (cost)effectiveness of 5FU and PDT compared to SE in BD and 2) to compare the effectiveness of 5FU with that of PDT. With a better understanding of the (cost)effectiveness of alternative treatment options, the investigators will supply the necessary evidence for national and international guidelines, to achieve more uniformity in treatment of BD. Study design: Randomized controlled non-inferiority multicenter trial. Study population: Patients ≥18 years, with a histological proven primary lesion of Bowen's disease, visiting Maastricht University Medical Centre, Catharina hospital Eindhoven, VieCuri MC Venlo or Zuyderland Medical Centre Heerlen. Intervention: One group undergoes SE with a 5mm safety margin followed by routine histological examination. The other group receives PDT with application of methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) cream followed by two illuminations with a one-week interval. The third group receives 5FU cream, which has to be applied by the patient twice daily for 4 weeks. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary outcome is the proportion of patients with sustained clearance at 12 months post-treatment. Secondary outcomes are proportion of patients with clearance at 3 months, the long-term probability of sustained clearance, cost-effectiveness, patient satisfaction, patient preferences, compliance, side effects and cosmetic outcome. Post-treatment, patients will be asked to answer a short questionnaire regarding side effects, experience with the treatment and satisfaction.
Age range
18 Years
Sex
ALL
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bring these to your next appointment. They're a starting point for a shared conversation — not a sign you qualify or a recommendation to enrol.
Generated to help you prepare — always confirm anything about your own eligibility and care with the study team and your doctor.
The trial coordinator is the person who runs the study day to day. These cover the practical side — logistics, costs, and what taking part would actually mean for your life. The study team confirms whether you meet the criteria; these are questions to ask, not a sign you qualify.
A starting point for the conversation — always confirm anything about your own eligibility, costs, and care with the study team and your doctor.
Sustained clearance (no residue, recurrence nor progression)
Timeframe: 12 months post-treatment