Currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of surgical drainage combined with antibiotics versus dual-agent intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) catheter drainage of pleural space infections with concomitant antibiotic therapy. The absence of comparative data is a challenge for surgical and medical services in clinical decision-making for this common and morbid condition. This is a pilot study comparing surgical drainage of the pleural space in complex pleural effusions to bedside chest tube drainage using dual agent IPFT with the intent to inform on study algorithm and endpoint performance in anticipation of a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Feasibility of the proposed study algorithm as measured by percent of subjects enrolled to study completion, percent of subjects randomized but did not complete the study, and percent of health care professional protocol deviation
Timeframe: From patient identification to 1 year post discharge
Subject identification and accrual as measured by the percent of patients not screened and randomized and the time to accrual of 20 patients of the number of patients accrued in one year
Timeframe: From patient identification to 1 year post discharge