CompletedNot Applicable

Comparison of Ophthalmoscopy Findings Using PanOptic vs PanOptic + iExaminer

United States40 participantsStarted 2018-08-28

Plain-language summary

To examine how helpful the iExaminer will be as a training aid for medical students. The investigators will look into whether 1) it helps the medical students find pertinent eye findings for certain diagnoses and 2) it improves the medical students comfort level compared to using the PanOptic alone.

Who can participate

Age range18 Years – 80 Years

SexALL

See this in plain English?

AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.

Inclusion Criteria: \- All second-year medical students at the University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences may be included in our final study sample. Exclusion Criteria: * Students who have had significant prior exposure to direct ophthalmoscopy (e.g. they have used the direct ophthalmoscopy, PanOptic, or PanOptic with the iExaminer on a regular basis for more than one week). * Students with poor enough visual acuity that will prevent them from doing direct ophthalmoscopy

What they're measuring

Students confidence in using iExaminer to diagnose fundus findings

Timeframe: 9 months

Trial details

NCT IDNCT03860727

SponsorState University of New York at Buffalo

Sponsor typeOTHER

Study typeOBSERVATIONAL

Primary completion2019-05-07

View on ClinicalTrials.gov More Vision Disorders trials