This study prospectively analyses and describes a cohort of non-elderly hip fracture patients at four orthopaedic departments in two Scandinavian countries regarding epidemiology, treatment, Patient Reported Outcome Measures, functional outcome as well as clinical results.
See this in plain English?
AI-rewrites the medical criteria so a patient or caregiver can understand them. Always confirm with the trial site.
Bone Mineral Density (BMD) at the time of the fracture
Timeframe: Baseline
Trauma mechanism leading to the hip fracture
Timeframe: Baseline
Hip fracture type according to Garden classification (femoral neck fractures) and Arbeitsgemeinschaft fĂĽr Osteosynthesefragen (AO)-classification (other hip fractures)
Timeframe: Baseline
EQ-5D
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
EQ-VAS
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Oxford Hip Score
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
VAS-pain, satisfaction, rehabilitation (VAS-psr)
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
New Mobility Score
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Timed up and go
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
10 meter walking test
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Hand grip strength
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Complications after hip fracture surgery
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Reoperations after hip fracture surgery
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Radiological outcome after hip fracture surgery
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years
Diagnosis of avascular necrosis by MRI with metal artefact reduction
Timeframe: Patients are followed up during two years